Recently, my wife and I watched again Peter Jackson‘s films of The Lord of the Rings, J. R. R. Tolkien‘s masterwork. Now, we are watching the films with the director’s, producers’, and writers’ commentaries. The question that immediately arises when one watches a movie based on a book that one loves is whether the movie does the novel justice. Does the movie tell the same story as the novel?
We have enjoyed the story of The Lord of the Rings in three media: Tolkien’s novel, Jackson’s film, and the BBC’s radio production. I have read, viewed, and listened to each of these many times. Is the story the same in each medium?
The answer is "No," if by "the same," one means that the movie and the novel are identical in each detail. Given the differences between a film and a book, it is impossible that the two be identical.
The answer is "Yes," if by the "the same," one means that the movie and the novel tell the "same story," however different the two may be in detail. For The Lord of the Rings, my judgment is that Peter Jackson does tell the same story as does Tolkien. For that matter, the BBC’s radio production also tells the same story.
Consider this possibility: the "real" Story lies behind any particular telling of the story in any medium. While we can consider Tolkien’s novel to be the canonical (authoritative) version of the Story of the destruction of the One Ring, the other versions can still tell the Story, although different in detail from the canonical version.
The BBC radio production is very close textually to the novel. (Ian Holm plays Frodo in this version, and, of course, he plays Bilbo in Jackson’s films.) But the radio version omits the Old Forest, Bombadil, and the Barrow Downs just as does Jackson’s film. Like most readers of the novel, my wife and I both delight in Tom Bombadil and Goldberry; yet I understand why someone telling the Story in a different medium would omit them.)
An analogy for the relationship of Jackson’s films to the novel: we can see the films (and the radio production) as remixes of the novel, just as musicians remix songs and albums. Actually, musicians may release a song in versions of different lengths; in such a case, do we ask which version is the "real" song? Really, we decide which version we prefer. Realistically, isn’t that what people do with novels and movies based on them?
Here’s a last question, which I only mention: how much can a version (or remix) of a story change it without making it a different story? It’s a question that I and the students of a course in the fantastic in literature and film discussed without arriving at any kind of definite answer. The answer is surely up to the individual.

Those who’ve known me for awhile may be surprised that I’m department chair. I’m as surprised as anyone. I said more than once that I never wanted to be chair. But now I am and have been for 18 months.
How am I finding it? Different than I had thought. Not as hard in some ways, harder in others. Truth to tell, I find rewards and satisfactions as chair. (Frustrations and perplexities too, of course.) I have learned a lot of how things work: things like managing the budget, scheduling courses, working with development, hiring faculty, recruiting students, and much else. Many of those procedures are changing under the new system, which takes effect today, 1 July 2007.
But this entry is not about the daily details of managing the department or the new organization of the campus. It is about some basic lessons I’m learning as chair.
Here’s a brief list of some important lessons. Most people probably already know them. I would’ve acknowledged them back in the pre-chair past. They are much different from my current perspective.

1. It’s never done. I’ll never finish everything. I may complete—I’d better!—this task or that, but there will always be more to do, an indefinite queue of "doables." When I am chair no longer, there will still be things undone. Can’t be avoided.
   Knowing that everything will never be done—that I can never sit back at 4:30 and say, "Nothing else to do; see what comes in tomorrow," that knowledge is a relief. I can do what is immediate, then what is intermediate, and then, maybe, the distant. I’ll always have something to do tomorrow.
2. I’m not alone. It’s heartening to find that I’m not the only chair who feels he/she doesn’t know everything and seeks to find the right procedure and the right information. My fellow chairs are more knowledgeable and competent than I, and I learn from them. I also find their uncertainties reassuring in the face of my own. If I don’t know everything, that’s okay.

And? I’m finding that I can do the job and find satisfaction in it. The department I chair is a good department: talented teachers, productive researchers, involved students. I can’t take credit for their achievements, but I can help them achieve.

On June 2, Phelps County celebrated its sesquicentennial—its 150th anniversary. Among the celebratory events was a group of Civil War reenactors portraying Union troops from St. Louis. They camped next to the original county courthouse, as Union troops camped here in the 1860s, using the courthouse for a hospital among other things.
How is this event connected with the University and with the Department of English and Technical Communication? The university is located in Phelps County; the department teaches literature of the Civil War period. As an example, here is the first stanza from a poem in Walt Whitman‘s Drum Taps:

"A sight in camp in the daybreak gray and dim,
"As from my tent I emerge so early sleepless,
"As slow I walk in the cool fresh air the path near by the hospital tent,
"Three forms I see on stretchers lying, brought out there untended lying,
"Over each the blanket spread, ample brownish woolen blanket,
"Gray and heavy blanket, folding, covering all."

Living across the street from the old courthouse, in a house where Union officers were quartered, I’m moved to awaken and find the encampment across the street. An event like this reenactment brings images of the past into the present, just as does Whitman’s poem and as a literature class does.